JurídicoESEN
Order (Auto)February 23, 2012

A- de 2012

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Diego Eduardo López Medina

✓Claimant Martha Parada Noval

✓
Topic · hard data
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

2 topics · 2 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
Case-law reporter's summary (what was argued and decided, in prose)

Aceptación de impedimento.

Con el presente auto la Sala de Conjueces acepta el impedimento manifestado por el doctor JUAN FERNANDO JARAMILLO PEREZ para seguir actuando como conjuez en el proceso de la referencia y en su reemplazo se designa la doctor RODOLFO ARANGO RIVADENEIRA.

Case-law reporter's text · normalized for reading (all caps → sentence case)
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. Primero. ACEPTAR el impedimento manifestado por el doctor JUAN FERNANDO JARAMILLO PÉREZ, para seguir actuando como conjuez en el proceso de la referencia
  2. Segundo. DESIGNAR como conjuez, en reemplazo del doctor JARAMILLO PÉREZ, al doctor RODOLFO ARANGO RIVADENEIRA, como resultado del sorteo realizado de la lista de conjueces de la Corte Constitucional.
  3. NOTIFÍQUESE.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

Cites0
It cites no recorded decisions.
Cited by0
No decision cites it yet.

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.